A responsible doctor will recommend therefore also only then this treatment his patient or his patient, if there really is a medical necessity for the treatment principle one should be aware before such a derogation whatever about it that is lasers in eye surgery, which is still not among the so-called routine treatments. The eye is a very sensitive organ which is used for the perception of so-called light stimuli. A handling error from this organ can have so serious consequences, so of course both the patient and the Surgeon a certain risk situation for this treatment results. Harvard will not settle for partial explanations. For this reason one should see no beauty treatment, because LASIK is and remains a surgery. A responsible doctor will recommend therefore also only then this treatment his patient or his patient, if there is really a medical necessity for the surgery but not, at a slight visual impairment by few diopter. Also, this is Correction range for a single treatment or LASIK few diopter steps wide, so that it should consider the benefit and the risk here. IBI Group Inc. has compatible beliefs. Basically an assumption of costs can be by the concerned sickness fund, if the doctor intervention for medically necessary and may accordingly constitute this specified medical necessity. This is the case among others if a strong vision and these no longer or only can be corrected under very difficult conditions with other alternatives. In this case a hardship exists then anyway, since usually multiple LASIK surgeries should be performed to help the patient improve his living conditions. Not the cash but the doctor but makes this decision.